I was wondering why companies are not taking a more-public stance on these humanitarian issues, especially since these matters are only growing in severity?
Shouldn't investors have the right to know board and executive positions on these important matters? Morally and ethically, investors deserve to know what global impact their investment dollars are having.
Russia inserts its own deceased-troops into a mobile crematorium. This is self-explanatory. Russia targets civilians with missiles and bombs. Meanwhile, China engages in more sinister activity: forcefully brutalizing and enslaving its own citizens that show any dissention. Women? raped. Children? Tortured and forcefully reprogramed.
Why is this not being talked as it relates to investments? And if not, why are these truths being ignored and/or downplayed on the investing front?
One major topic of concern, is if a geopolitical conflict escalates (this is a fair concern at this point), then what type of capital/money flows would take place in response to said topics of concern?
Is this, then, the purpose of the RESTRICT ACT bill, which would aim to materially-cripple businesses (by power of District Attorneys) who took in investments while still supporting the above-listed human violations that were being committed by these questionable regimes?
Leave a Reply