I like this post (10 stocks I would hold 10 years). But except for a few usual suspects (MSFT, AAPL, GOOG), if we want to be more adventurous to try and find a hypergrowth stock hoping for better award, I don't think I did enough DD to say I'm confident in holding a stock for 10 years, except for one stock – I'd hold it for at least 5 years, probably 10, simply because its depressed valuation (due to risks that'd be resolved) and overlooked growth warrant a much faster growth than those megatechs.
I posted about it 11 days ago before its 2022Q1 ER release, accurately predicting that it'd achieve the first profitable quarter ever and its business was also better than ever. I also detailed all the business side, significant risk/reward, etc. It's frankly the one midcap stock that I've done so much DD to be confident to hold for at least 5 years. But many on this board chose to ignore the stock because of its past bad name.
But my question to them is: Had you read my post in detail and given it some chance, you would've been beaming with smiles right now with a 47% gain in 11 days!! Why ignore or even ridicule a stock and dismiss other people's careful DD (accumulated over literally a year) handed over on a silver platter to you? Do people on /r/stocks NOT want to make money? I wouldn't think so.
So please, now that it's clear that many investors would in fact put money on the line, in a bleeding market no less, to get into this stock, would you consider reading my post now? I can't say it won't pullback after such a remarkable run in such a short period, but over the next 5 years, I fully believe that we have a potential of 700-900% upside from here (growth of 50% this year, then 20-35% next 4 years, assuming PS=6 to 8, a lower PS and better PE than $BROS – its current PS is only 3 while the similar and less hypergrowth/profitable BROS is 12.5!!).
Please read my post and don't just dismiss it without careful reading. Those who did 11 days ago missed 47% gains!!
Leave a Reply